Quote from: tiptopgemdotcom on April 20, 2019, 08:39:35 PM

Quote from: steveabrahams on April 20, 2019, 03:58:11 AM

Quote from: Danda23 on February 10, 2019, 05:24:24 PM

There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.

So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.

What do you think about this?

Tbh KYC for bounty participants is a joke, bounty hunters should be not do KYC too because they are not their customers. Well, for the positive thing, KYC can help to eliminate all multi accounts on the bounty. In the end, the stakes that the alts got will be deleted and give it to the real person.

The bounty distribution method with the stakes is not fair and the bounty managers should think about the alternative options. Honestly, KYC is used for eliminating the weak hands and the bounty participants are victims of greedy teams who don't like share.

using stakes as a form of payment method per week is okay but what is not acceptable to me is the bounty campaigns are mainly dishonest . most of them arent paying as what they promise because the campaign have turned into scam .

sometimes they are paying if we are lucky but the problem is the value of the coins which is verry low . kyc is not also a problem at all but as long as the bounty will pay you and the value of the coins is much higher compare to other bounties that does not have a kyc .