Quote from: 1miau on April 20, 2019, 07:25:03 PM

Most distrusts are obviously from cryptohunter / Thule et al (like my distrust) Cheesy

To be fair, Thule changed most of his Trust list here.
I have a new exclusion too from someone I don't know. Luckily, I'm in good company:

Quote

Trust list for: Upgrade00 (Trust: awaiting update) (42 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-04-20_Sat_09.37h)
Upgrade00 Distrusts:
1. ~mprep (Trust: 70: -0 / +7) (DT1! (19) 347 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~LoyceV (Trust: 108: -0 / +16) (DT1! (45) 2510 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: OgNasty on April 20, 2019, 07:53:04 PM

Any chance of getting a similar list ordered by the difference between the number of users who trust and distrust a user?

1. 383 (=392 inclusions - 9 exclusions): theymos (Trust: 197: -0 / +21) (4237 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 193 (=236 inclusions - 43 exclusions): OgNasty (Trust: -8: -6 / +56) (649 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 127 (=138 inclusions - 11 exclusions): dooglus (Trust: 120: -0 / +12) (126 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 124 (=126 inclusions - 2 exclusions): minerjones (Trust: 798: -0 / +88) (604 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 118 (=120 inclusions - 2 exclusions): Cyrus (Trust: 85: -0 / +9) (105 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 113 (=114 inclusions - 1 exclusions): John (John K.) (Trust: 153: -0 / +16) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 105 (=129 inclusions - 24 exclusions): Blazed (Trust: 597: -0 / +60) (93 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 103 (=124 inclusions - 21 exclusions): gmaxwell (Trust: 140: -0 / +14) (1156 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 102 (=112 inclusions - 10 exclusions): LoyceV (Trust: 108: -0 / +16) (2510 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 101 (=106 inclusions - 5 exclusions): philipma1957 (Trust: 170: -0 / +17) (646 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
.......
....... (click for a longer list)
.......
9130. -15 (=0 inclusions - 15 exclusions): kken01 (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9131. -15 (=0 inclusions - 15 exclusions): pirashki (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9132. -15 (=0 inclusions - 15 exclusions): ~~BeEvil~~ Banned! (Trust: neutral) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9133. -16 (=0 inclusions - 16 exclusions): Luana Trade (Trust: -128: -7 / +0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9134. -17 (=10 inclusions - 27 exclusions): jonald_fyookball (Trust: -7: -3 / +1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9135. -19 (=16 inclusions - 35 exclusions): dogie (Trust: 30: -0 / +3) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9136. -19 (=0 inclusions - 19 exclusions): S_Therapist (Trust: -8: -3 / +0) (265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9137. -21 (=0 inclusions - 21 exclusions): game-protect (Trust: -4096: -12 / +0) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9138. -52 (=116 inclusions - 168 exclusions): Lauda (Trust: 301: -0 / +31) (871 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9139. -56 (=37 inclusions - 93 exclusions): Quickseller (Trust: -8178: -13 / +14) (448 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Quote from: suchmoon on April 20, 2019, 09:11:28 PM

LoyceV, would you be able to calculate the sum of all trust scores of one's "excluders"? Or sum of merit scores? Perhaps do the same for "includers" and then calculate the difference. Or some sort of other metric in addition to the number of exclusions, which is heavily skewed by sockpuppets and bus-and-bicycle schemes.

I think I'll skip this one. Too much work Sad

Quote from: bones261 on April 20, 2019, 09:17:42 PM

At the moment many of us are distrusted by the same people who also seem to hate busses and bicycles.

Luckily, Newbie Trust lists don't matter for other users, and by creating a bad list they kinda disqualify themselves from being serious users.

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 09:21:17 PM

None of that means anything when 15 people have sent 20.7% of all merit ever sent.

I calculated 19.34% as of last Friday.

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 09:40:59 PM

I am just pointing out that considering that who is on DT is ultimately based on merit, and that 15 people have given out over 20% of all merit, any trust or merit stat is going to be skewed heavily towards what those 15 people want.

It's not ideal, but it's something. If users without earned Merit could vote, the users with most sockpuppets would get to decide.

Quote

Some of these people are trustworthy, others, not so much, but none of them have come close to demonstrating it is appropriate to having anywhere near the amount of influence they have.

It is indeed scary how one post from me changes someone from DT1 (1) to DT1 (-5), without excluding him by myself. But that is how the system is supposed to work: voting based on available data.

Quote from: killyou72 on April 21, 2019, 10:55:31 AM

Something seems broken because I wouldn't have an issue sending first without escrow to the first 20 people On that list

See:

Quote from: LoyceV on January 25, 2019, 10:12:36 PM

I encourage anyone to create their own Trust list. Don't confuse your Trust list with Feedback though:

Feedback: people you trust (or don't trust: red)
Trust list: people who's judgement on others you trust (or don't trust: ~)