@ Steamtyme
I hope you will be red flagging the nutildah account or I will call you on double standards here. Read my above post for details.
You can hope all you would like, and form your opinion of my standards as you see fit. Considering this goes back to before I was a twinkle in the forums eye (a member), it's well outside what I would tag. Iirc this is also close to but not past when sales became a taggable offence within the community.
I'll keep pointing this out as well. My feedback is for me, if I agreed with account sales then I wouldn't tag this member. If my feedback isn't up to your standards feel free to exclude me from your custom list, and/or have people remove me from their trust list. I honestly do not worry about being a DT member, I'm just using the system that's in place how I feel it should be used.
You may once again want to try and get back in the habit of staying on specific topics, and not broadening it to encompass all side grievances. I can't even remember how many different threads I've seen you post the Nutildah stuff.
Explain how this is a side issue? this is a directly related incident. This is building a case that your red is not valid unless you are ready to apply red to ALL account sellers.
Nutildah clearly stated account sales are allowing scammers greater possibility of pulling scam. He then either tried to sell or did sell the account. Nobody knows. This is knowingly increasing the probability of scamming on this board.
The initial poster has demonstrated nothing like this level of untrustworthy behavior.
You are simply trying to divert away from an On Topic debate about your red trust. Explain why you find the nutildah account MORE trustworthy than the initial poster. I await you explanation. Time past is a cop out.
You are employing double standards to favor your DT pals. That is clear.
I will use this specific case as double standards if you do not explain why you find this members actions more untrustworthy than nutildahs.