Quote from: actmyname on April 23, 2019, 08:53:28 PM

Big capitalized words don't make me want to read it. They have the opposite effect on your post. This is amplified by an order of magnitude when you bold it. Now, if you were to color it blue... that would certainly be an eyesore.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

There is not a "HUGE" problem with the "SYSTEM", the only issue is that there is no "CHECK" on it.

Let's start with this statement.

You can appeal. In Reputation. And there have been instances in which DT members have disagreed with one another and countered the rating. Example: me, on multiple occasions.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

Now what this means is that "PEOPLE" are FREE. Like someone said above, it almost gives "OPEN" opportunity to people to "GANG" up against ANYONE, who is even "CORRECT".

Show me an example of such a case where the red-trusted member was in the right.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

Although, I believe some people here are genuinely "GREAT" in terms of their intention, but by large, there are more who are making life "HELL" for beginners here.

I agree. There exist many scammers frolicking across the forum.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

The only "WISH" I ever have is that there should be proper "MODERATOR" super-mod like and he should be incharge along with the Admin to keep "CHECK" on members who have the "POWER" to give Feedbacks.

It's called DT1.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

Just like we can "REPORT" posts, there should be "APPEAL" option against the feedback, where the said user should be able to add his opinion along with the proofs.

It's called Reputation.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

Which should go "DIRECTLY" to the Admin and Mod. And then IF they consider that it's right, then not only the "APPEAL" should be rejected, but also the user gets "BANNED" for certain number of days/week/months. And in case the IF the "APPEAL" is proven "SUCCESSFUL, then the user who provided feedback should be "REMOVED" from that position or probably should be "GIVEN" warning along with asking to delete the Feedback.

And when we start getting threads of "my appeal was rejected??!?!?!" and false positives/negatives?

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

I am not going to be crazy and say Admin/Mod should be check every single such Appeal deeply, but probably could just take some overview of it.

Unfortunately the reality is that for a significant chunk of negative feedback, looking over the evidence will take an equally significant amount of time. I would know: I had to pore over a few hundred of Lauda's sent feedback.

Quote from: Joseph R. Cord on April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM

But even just having "SUCH" system will "INSTALL" fear on such "BULLIES" that there is SOMETHING that can "STOP" them, as right now there is "NOTHING" that's there for it. And that's the reason why some people think they are "ADMIN" of this forum.

theymos has blacklist power.

I have "NOT" written a "LOVE" story that I want you to read, there is nothing much to read with me using the "BOLD" part, it was just done like that.

If you "LIKE" the appeal in that format, then why not have "REPORT" in same format?

If I begin showing "HOW" lovely some Feedback are then probably it will take days to get even 50% of it. And I am sorry I am not going to waste my time on that.

Quote from: actmyname on April 23, 2019, 08:53:28 PM

It's called DT1.

It's called Reputation.

So, basically you want to "TEACH" things here. Do you seriously think I am not aware of it? So, please talk sense if you can.

Quote from: actmyname on April 23, 2019, 08:53:28 PM

And when we start getting threads of "my appeal was rejected??!?!?!" and false positives/negatives?

An action by Admin or Mod is far more "RESPECTABLE" than done by these genius and self-claimed admins.

Lastly, IF you read my post "AGAIN" you should understand I NEVER said that it should be checked "DEEPLY", but just a moment of overview to see anything really wrong while there should be record of appeal against anyone, so if there are too many appeals against someone, then that person can be checked properly for once, at least.

While the "SYSTEM" I suggested automatically makes people "FEAR" to "APPEAL", as rejected one means "BAN" of certain time and similarly, it also install "FEAR" on the person who leaves feedback, as he too can "LOSE" his power.

That's how you keep "CHECK"

And I am not saying that just because "I" or "SOME" dislike the system that it should be done, but this is just "HOW" LIFE is.

Check the "WORLD" a country that doesn't have a proper "CHECK" system are suffering the most, while ones where there is check and balance, they are growing stronger and better.