Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on April 28, 2019, 12:38:27 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on April 28, 2019, 11:01:16 AM

*derp*

How can you observe "double standards" while you have no insight in what posts I report? As Tman already stated: Theymos doesn't like your behaviour, the moderators don't like your behaviour and nobody, besides your alt accounts, like your behaviour. Have you ever considered that you are the problem here? The only "observable event" is your mental health quickly deteriorating. Get help.

Perhaps I am not accustomed to dealing with people as stupid as you are. I have already stated that your double standards are contained within your posts. Try to read and understand what I am telling you. It has nothing to do with reporting. Your straw men are nothing other than an annoyance.

Theymos has NOT said anything about our behavior. If you are referring to cryptohunters limited interaction with Theymos you will note that Theymos was observably incorrect on several points that can be clearly demonstrated. Unless one has invented a brand new definition of scamming that we are not aware of in relation to lauda and xcoin. We believe Theymos is not as versed as others here are with the alt section, and is lacking in lots of back ground knowledge on several individuals that now infest meta.

He likely has limited time and is not a real student of this alt board to the level others are. His council to cryptohunter was based upon a metric that is also gamed. The deletion of cryptohunters posts after analysis looked to be a special case (they were not irrelevant or off topic) but could have been wise since he wanted to directly shut down lauda's defamation of hostfat quickly, and preferred not to become embroiled in a highly relevant, on topic debate that hinged on precedents and back ground information that demonstrated laudas claim hostfat should be removed (with no evidence provided by lauda) need to be treated with caution and the reasons as to why that caution would be prudent (plus the evidence and observable instances required) also similar precedents for similar scenarios. We notice cryptohunter raised 3 sensible topics to understand permitted flow after this which nobody was interested in discussing. Cryptohunters posts there without direct intervention by Theymos would have been very beneficial to the reader if he was to gain the optimal insight into the situation. Any debate on that should be conducted elsewhere but we would welcome it.

There is no "behavior" other than pushing for a transparent and fair environment that treats each member equally. That would surely gain Satoshi's blessing. That is far more important than pleasing anyone else that does not want to fight for that kind of environment.

So to just shut you up once and for all let us place you a few challenges.

1. present the instances of incorrect information that we have presented.
2. present the instances that demonstrate an agenda other than fighting for a fair and transparent system for all members, that you can locate in our own post history.
3. present some instances of your own original thought provoking posts that made any difference to this board since you joined. So we can examine if you are even worth our time. If you are just an low functioning shit poster then please accept you will not have the capacity to fully engage with us in debate.
4. state that when we investigate your own post history we will not find anything that demonstrates you are a liar or a scammer or observably untrustworthy in financial matters ?
5. explain why "the vast majority" of liars , scammers, trust abusers, and their colluding pals seem to all be spamming fortune jack gambling sigs all over the board. (that includes you)
6. why are you such a failure that you need to spam a sig after all of these years or are you just greedy?

After that then get back on topic or leave the thread.