Quote from: Lauda on May 02, 2019, 06:38:26 AM

Quote from: theymos on May 01, 2019, 11:39:17 PM

Note that olcaytu2005 is banned on his request.

That is a very odd request after everything that's been going on.

Quote from: theymos on May 01, 2019, 11:39:17 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 01, 2019, 10:56:52 PM

You (cryptohunter)..

Ah, now that the the master has spoken will it run away?

There is never any running away on our part. Never use your own natural behaviors as a basis to speculate on the behaviors of the honest and upright members here. ANYTIME you want to debate with us one on one your past here you are more than welcome to do so. Reply yes or no now or just run away. Remember the extensive arguments you had and lost in the past with cryptohunter. Remember the 2 billion dollar lies you tried to push down investors throats when you had bags of dirtcoins? You said you were new then and had changed your ways since then. We now realize you have not changed at all LaudaM.

Our response to theymos will remain as it always shall be. We disagree with parts but are fully open to public debate on his opinions.
Regardless of which we still believe theymos is far more fair than you and your goons. Except he will not debate his opinions. He gives them and it is final in his own mind. That is the end of it.

We opened a thread for theymos alone to come and discuss things with us. Not to be derailed and destroyed by false claims from you and your goons. You should be struck off from this forum for all of the dishonest things you have done.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138500.0

EDIT - it seems they deleted that thread. We call for presentation of these lies cryptohunter was spreading after his red trust? we doubt this is true since cryptohunter repeatedly challenged the entire meta board to present any incorrect information he had posted and they failed to bring 1 instance. We also doubt that ANY person can have a more valid claim of trust abuse or a broken trust system than a scammer and liar giving red trust to an honest member for them suggesting they would encourage others to review their post history after repeated lies and groundless attacks from the trust abuser. That is the inverse of what red trust is for. So we cast in to doubt that part of theymos's post also. It seems theymos is lacking the knowledge of the entire situation or is misrepresenting what took place.