Quote from: CryptoBry on April 29, 2019, 08:15:39 AM

The KYC requirement in many ICO projects has been the bone of contention of many investors and supporters with many thinking and feeling that this is not needed as this is the industry that proposes decentralization, anonymity and privacy. However, a project can argue that it is the law that requires them to know their customers and they are in fact just following the regulation. The problem is that KYC is not a guarantee that a project can never go down the coffin and run with the investors' money...maybe travelling to the "moon" and have an indefinite vacation in there until the victims can forget their misfortune of trusting them.

Now, if these project owners can require us to undergo the KYC process...should it not be rational that they themselves submit to the same so that we can be sure that we are dealing with real people with real address?

I agree with you
but this is what we must do in investment or bounty hunters
almost all ico projects require KYC even though we don't know how they do and process our data safely. especially if only for useless ico and a scam
this problem is so very serious and continues to be a long discussion that there is never a solution.
and I think we really need regulation for this