Quote from: Saint-loup on May 03, 2019, 12:21:17 PM

Quote from: asche on May 03, 2019, 12:11:05 PM

En fait même avec 2 verts si tu prends un rouge tu es ...

Code:

else
score = unique_positive - 2^(unique_negative)
if score >= 0
start_time = time of first negative
score = unique_positive since start_time - unique_negative since start_time
if(score < 0)
return ??? (orange)

score = 2 -2^1 =0
score = 0-1 = -1

... orange.

Oui c'est bien ce que j'avais vu sur Yaplatu et je ne sais plus qui. Merci pour l'algo. En outre il n'y a plus le message rouge affiché de ce que j'avais vu, et je ne crois pas que ça empêche de participer à des campagnes (?)

Bon j'ai l'impression que c'est plus compliqué que ça... je crois que je le voyais ? ?? mais ça colle pas avec ce post de Theymos

Quote from: theymos on May 20, 2015, 06:57:19 PM

??? is a valid score in the new algorithm.

Quote from: dogie on May 20, 2015, 06:41:39 PM

Doesn't that mean if someone receives a positive and a negative rating, they'll go negative if the negative is newer?

If someone has 1 positive and 1 negative, then the time doesn't matter. They'll have a score of -1.

Examples:
Old -> New
+ - : -1
- + : -1
+ + - : ???
+ - + : 0
- + + : 1
+ + + : >=3
- - + : -3
+ - - : -3
- - - : -8

Quote from: dogie on May 20, 2015, 06:41:39 PM

That seems like quite an extreme decay, ratings after 10 months are worthless? Its going to lead to a lot of reposted ratings to refresh them.

There is no decay. Ratings grow in weight from 1 to 10, then stay at 10 forever. (If the rated person has no negatives.)

Edit: je crois que je le voyais comme ça en fait... (avec des chiffres differents surement)