Quote from: r1s2g3 on May 05, 2019, 05:48:50 AM

Any vote based system is not a correct system for dispute resolution.Public opinion can be very biased and sometimes easily swings with some events.
You need fact based evaluation system but I guess by mediating in deals you will easily become party to the law suits.

I think the same could be said about opaque resolution systems as well. I've seen nonstop talk about how PayPal has ruled incorrectly and all they're given is a generic mail response. A centralised system like PayPal is subject to social engineering and there are plenty of guides on it.

For those reasons, I feel a voting system is best. Most people are going to choose the correct answer when it is warranted. Bad dudes are going to be malicious regardless of if there's a public or private system. I want to make things better for the well-intentioned user.

While no system is perfect, I feel like we can always improve. The public voting system is no holy grail by no means, but I do consider it an improvement over what exists now.

Thanks for the good comment!

Quote from: thereader on May 05, 2019, 09:48:10 AM

Here is another point: employee certification. This is the most important part when choosing a service. How responsible is the person I let into my house to fix the plumbing?

I can offer valid psychological tests and a persons testing procedure to cut off abnormal behavior and apparent abnormalities.

The person who does the work is responsible for their own quality of work. It would be no different if you rang up a company or if they offered services on Taskly. We don't take any responsibility for the final products. It's up to the user to do their own due diligence and ensure that they are confident in who are they are getting services from. Similar to how eBay isn't responsible for what sellers send to people.

Quote from: AndreyVen on May 05, 2019, 03:11:16 AM

You'd have to combine many services into a decentralised platform like this.

Decentralised reputation score, decentralised insurance contracts, decentralised community moderation...

Every aspect of the centralised version you'll have to take into account one way or another. There are big projects working on each of these main aspects, but they are far from consumer friendly at this early stage.

I agree. I feel like there's a few good ideas in the cryptosphere but it's quite complex for the average person to get a grasp on. Pushing forward for public acceptance is the best thing we can do currently.