Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on May 06, 2019, 04:01:08 PM

It's sorted based on the ~~highest ranked~~ oldest? DT1's trust list in which they appear. The DT1s are sorted based on account age.

The first 34 entries are all included on theymos' trust list. The next 32 (from 35 - 66) are on gmaxwell's trust list. The next 17 (67 - 83) are on phantastisch's trust list. And so on. It obviously doesn't display duplicates. It also doesn't matter if a user is trusted or distrusted by the DT1 member in question - if they are anywhere on their trust list, they will be grouped under that user. For example, Gavin Andresen is number 36, under gmaxwell's group, despite being excluded by gmaxwell.

Thanks, I hadn't looked into it, but this makes a lot of sense. I'll quote you in the OP.
I edited your quote, do you agree?

Quote

In short, it's most likely just the way LoyceV's script collected the data. It's totally arbitrary and means nothing.

Correct, I wrote that in the OP:

Quote from: LoyceV on May 04, 2019, 08:59:34 AM

I used the same order as used on Trust settings, I'm not sure what it's based on.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on May 06, 2019, 04:01:08 PM

Quote from: tranthidung on May 06, 2019, 02:48:51 PM

- In my opinion, a threshold at 25 merit over last year is minimum one to judge quality of DT2 member. The threshold should be higher, 50 or 100. I would prefer to choose the threshold at 100 earned merits.

This is too high considering the threshold for DT1 is only 10 merit. I think either 10 for both, or perhaps 25 or 50 for DT1 and 10 for DT2 would be reasonable.

I'd say 2 inclusions from DT2 would help a lot. DT1 needs at least 10 votes from users with earned Merit, so 2 votes from DT1 isn't that much to ask for.

Quote from: tranthidung on May 06, 2019, 02:48:51 PM

- It might be good if you can make a list of only DT2 member whom did not earn a signed merit so far, rather than a mixture like current list. It is ridiculous when a real DT2 member has not been able to earn a single merit so far, especially if still being actively in the forum last year.

Wait for it......... Cheesy