Quote from: sammy007 on May 08, 2019, 12:35:13 PM

Quote from: aeternity on May 08, 2019, 12:32:18 PM

If we follow your suggestion, the dev projects would compete between themselves for funding, right? When a developer introduces a project, they will have to defend what/why/how they want to create. I personally don't believe that the whole community would be prepared enough technically to judge what should be implemented and how and what is more urgent (I don't mean to offend anyone, many people in the crypto space are not devs). Do you?

There is no big competition among BIPs and EIPs. Once again, you just confirmed that you are going to decide it all by yourself. There is nothing left to talk about IMO.

AE is not a venture chain, if somebody want to write an app for it it does not mean they must be paid out of the block reward at all. It must be commercial project, a DEX or craptokitties or something else. Could be even ICO scam just like AE on ethereum. There could be many other projects on AE with their own funding model. And none of them must be paid by taxpayers (I presume you are mature enough to understand that block cut is literally a taxation model).

App ecosystem for a blockchain project must be a natural process of the grow, you provide base system (epoch) and some basic apps like wallets. The rest will either appear organically or never appear at all.

Well, it seems you pretty much CEO happy and you want free money so you will manage them on your sole discretion. Seriously, after reading this I see no reason to continue this dialog.

The BRI won't be spent on æpps, but on protocol development solely. We indicated that in the initial announcement blog post.

Best,
The AE Team