Quote from: jbreher on May 11, 2019, 05:34:28 PM

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 11, 2019, 07:21:17 AM

Quote from: jbreher on April 06, 2019, 03:03:47 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 06, 2019, 12:40:49 AM

Quote from: jbreher on April 06, 2019, 12:17:17 AM

Despite your protestations, you have utterly failed -- in any manner whatsoever -- to describe any core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks.

You are not the boss of me.

True. You're gonna do what you're gonna do. And you're not gonna do what you're not gonna do. One of those items on the latter list would appear to be to provide a description of the core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks. For you have yet to do so, despite your repeated false statements that you already have.

.

For low security transactions: https://blockstream.com/2019/05/08/en-liquid-new-members-and-integrations/

Ah yes. The Core plan is to pay Blockstream for the privilege of using Blockstream's proprietary, permissioned so-called 'sidechain' (and falsely labeled as such, I might add) - a consequence mandated by Blockstream's crippling of the underlying public permissionless blockchain. If Blockstream doesn't kick you off Blockstream's said proprietary permissioned so-called 'sidechain'.

That's what you're going with?

There will be a world of competing second layer solutions, Lightning and Liquid will be among them

The bar to entry is low so just about anyone will be able to spin up a competing second level solution. Network effects, as always, will remain valuable.

Perhaps the Visa network will build its own version of Liquid.