LoyceV, thank you for creating the thread Red trust on Bestmixer: is this justified?.
NowYouAreSee, we appreciate a lot that you're looking for answers between the lines.
Thank you,
BestMixer Team
Could you care to answer the unanswered questions in that topic? Thanks!
Since my post got ignored/wasn't read I will post this here. Here is my post from the topic regarding the red trust:
While you are replying here, I checked out your website and I found some contradictions on it:
We want to be free on the Internet. All of our rights and obligations are based on the principles of crypto-democracy which we have to form together with you.
Owing to blockchain technology which ensures trust between us and the client without the need for any third party intervention or mediating government agency, we ultimately have no need of registering in the pursuit of keeping anonymity and freedom alive on the internet.
And, most importantly, since our service is completely anonymous and we are answerable to no one but the client whom we serve, we will do whatever is necessary to keep the confidentiality of every transaction regardless of where in the world they originate from or what the government policies in those countries may be.
Your terms of service says otherwise:



Could you explain why you are claiming to offer fully anonimity and freedom, answer to no one/government policies and serve customers from anywhere in the world while your terms of service basically forbids every reason why someone would want to use a mixer?Your reply:
TheNewAnon135246, our opposing views can be considered biased against each other with equal probability.
Perhaps your second question will find its answer later when members Lauda and LeGaulois react to the main question of this thread regarding the red trust.
Both of those users have deleted their negative trust so I was wondering if you are willing to answer my question now.