Quote from: HF-Engineer on February 12, 2014, 11:57:03 PM

Guys, I asked about the upgrade kits and MPP and was told there were no MPP or upgrade kits ever offered in batch one. So apparently just because your BJ system was batch one, doesn't mean additional boards would be in the same batch.
-Phil

Quote from: starsoccer9 on February 13, 2014, 12:30:11 AM

Great so much for the MPP. Guess there will be lawsuits coming

Quote from: spectre2112 on February 13, 2014, 01:04:57 AM

I am NOT "shooting the messenger" (nor am I in Batch 1) but what they told you seems to directly contradict what is CURRENTLY posted on the Hashfast website MPP page:

"At HashFast, we understand that healthy, prosperous customers make for a healthy and prosperous company. We know that our customers are concerned about the rapid growth of the network hashrate and we stand by our customers. We designed our silicon so efficiently per square mm, that we are able offer you this protection. If the Bitcoin network hashrate increases so that your Baby Jet doesnt generate more Bitcoins in ninety days than you paid for it, HashFast will give you additional ASICs. In fact, we will give you up to 400% more hashing capacity than the Baby Jet you purchased. Yes, that does mean that if you dont make your money back in 90 days, we will increase your mining capacity to up to 2 Terahashes! The Miner Protection Program was given retroactively to ALL purchases of Batch 1 Baby Jets. For second and third batch machines, the Miner Protection Program was offered as an add-on, that customers could purchase for an additional fee. Currently the Miner Protection Program is not available for purchase."

So, while they may not have been "offered" at the time of purchase, ALL Batch 1 orders should be covered by the MPP since they were "GIVEN RETROACTIVELY."

Or am I misunderstanding something?

You guys are talking past each other.

I believe what Phil is saying is that even if you placed your upgrade kit order for a BabyJet Batch 1, the upgrade kit order itself wasn't a Batch 1 order. It's a Batch 2 or Batch 3 order. And similarly, the MPP for Batch 1 wasn't to be delivered together with the Batch 1 orders - it was closer to the Batch 3 or Batch 4 orders in the line. This is technically true.

However, I feel that the original order queue shouldn't be kept at least with the MPP program. MPP had a specific non-queue based timeline associated with it that has more to do with the actual Hashrate out there than a place in the queue. The original queue order should be interrupted for the MPP fulfillment.