Who is doing the "real investigation" then? Who other than PG and those potentially tainted by association have posted evidence, pro or con, substantiated or otherwise, about BA?

It's hard to know what to believe, but I keep seeing PG state things that are not refuted or only partially addressed. If he is spreading libel, why have none of the "offended" parties done something about it by now? He has posted his name and address multiple times. That his posts are deleted rather than being addressed is pretty convincing evidence that there is at least some truth in some of what he says. I'm learning more about BA and associates by following information and hints in his posts than I have received directly from BA and associates. There's something not right about that.

The useless posts here are the ones (like mine) that provide no new information about BA and associates, positive or negative, and only state personal opinion. If they served no other purpose, PG's posts have drawn BA out to provide more information, and that is a good thing and I appreciate his efforts.