Quote from: BADecker on May 19, 2019, 11:05:35 PM

^^^ Denying evolution doesn't have anything to do with it. Evolution is there in hoax form. We don't have to deny it.

Dog breeds don't have anything to do with changing animals from one kind to another... except if they are breed changes, which isn't changing one kind of animal to another. Humans are not a breed of some kind of single cell animal that lived in the ponds 400,000 years ago.

If you find DNA in one animal, so what? Proving evolution would take tracking the DNA of thousands or millions of animals over periods of hundreds of thousands of years in the past. As it is, we can't even agree on the ages of some of the fossils. We haven't even started to do what it takes to prove evolution theory evolution (ETE).

You still aren't showing any proof for ETE, which includes many thousands of years. In fact, you are more or less agreeing that there isn't any proof when you say that science dosn't magically provide facts and answers. So, since science hasn't provided ETE facts and answers, maybe science is trying to tell us that they don't exist.

There are only a tiny few facts and answers that might suggest evolution, while not suggesting something else at the same time. They don't prove evolution. They might only suggest that there might be something like evolution. So far, they also show that evolution probably doesn't exist, or that abiogenesis of every "kind" of creature might have been the way.

Since they show this, why say that evolution is fact? We don't know that evolution is fact. When we say that it is, without knowing that it is, we are simply furthering the point that...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

"Evolution is there in hoax form" doesn't really make any sense. It is there, and you've been provided with a lot of evidence of it happening in a way that's observable for us.
By multiple posters, at that.
Are you saying that a chihuahua is an identical animal to a great dane? The only thing tying those two together is that they're both mammals and share ancestry.
Most dog "breeds" only came into existance in a century or so, no magical gene splicing, just selective breeding and proper diets.
My point about science not magically providing answers is simply comparing it to dogma, it's not a religion, it doesn't preach -- it's a method of learning about the world.
"Science" won't prove things to you, the scientists doing the research will. The whole point of the scientific method is to arrive at a logical, and factually backed up, conclusion.
What you're looking for clearly isn't proof since all your replies to proof tend to be "haha that's not proof, show me proof".
If it's the word that's bugging you, just call it a theory. Would remind you that gravity is also a theory, doesn't make either of them any less real though.