Lauda thinks he can defend Hhampuz from having to respond by countering any negative rating he receives, and I would be unsurprised to see others do this too. Any countered rating will not change the underlying facts, which speak for themselves.
I hereby also forbid Hhampuz to respond. How about that? What will you do now? 
Regardless of the underlying reason why Hhampuz does not respond, the facts continue speaking for themselves.
There are no facts here.You should expect to receive some negative trust in the near future (not by me). This is the unfortunate reality of not siding with a particular group of people.
This is also a lie, but petahasher doesn't seem to care about that. If he isn't shady like recent revelations about certain users show, he has nothing to worry about. Nowadays you sound like a corrupt cop trying to protect corrupt politicians.Read my post above, brushing off accusations because the accuser is not trustworthy is a dangerous and damaging mindset.
I won't allow the accused to respond, that's how much I care about your virtue-signalling mindset, and obviously quickseller's scamming mindset.