Which is wrong again. He can choose to either indulge you and anger me, or not indulge you and not anger me. What would anyone sane do? I told you I can shut this down from many angles.
WOW! really!!
So Hhampuz is not responding here because he knows making you angry will destroy his reputation like you did for Bill and others? Also Hhampuz will never accepted as a gang member.
I mean how far we have to go to have these clear that Lauda is threatening other DTs not to talk against her or they will be destroyed. Shame all those who included her in their trust network and watching these insulting statements. You guys need Lauda to protect you. I see bounches of Monkeys seating on DT network.
@Hhampuz, you are losing your credibility in the forum if you are really not responding here because Lauda said so. Shame!
This
could even be a trap for you which Lauda planned. I mean think it this way,
Lauda will protect you the community will question you that you have not your own voice and then you will lose your credibility. A person with zero credibility is a burden. No one will use you and eventually this will effect your business here.
What if this is Lauda's plan to destroy you? Do not trust anyone over your own ethics especially in a place where you have no chance to see the person in real life. Have your own grownup voice.
EDIT,
LOL this is what happen when you talk free speech.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2602674https://i.imgur.com/6RJKqLR.pngThis is what you get when you anger Lauda.
Lauda: I already have explained that this an ALT account you did nothing for me but just proved that you are weak and your judgements are biased. In most cases you tag others who makes you angry.
@theymos, how many times you need proves. This also proves that why others are not excluding Lauda from their network.
