Quote from: The Pharmacist on May 27, 2019, 11:26:09 PM

Yeah, the only one who can provide the truth is Hhampuz, and it's so far not clear whether he's going to comment on this. I think it would be good if he did, but there may be reasons why he won't or can't. And as much as I don't like Quickseller, I don't think he's wrong for bringing attention to this. If this was something jamalaezaz or Quickseller did, I'm very sure there wouldn't be such a fuss if the same evidence was presented.

Have you missed to read this?

Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2019, 10:52:35 PM

Which is wrong again. He can choose to either indulge you and anger me, or not indulge you and not anger me. What would anyone sane do? I told you I can shut this down from many angles.

Quote from: bones261 on May 27, 2019, 11:36:02 PM

Quote from: mightyDTs on May 27, 2019, 11:14:12 PM

@Hhampuz, you are losing your credibility in the forum if you are really not responding here because Lauda said so. Shame!

Hhampuz should keep his mouth shut regarding this matter whether Lauda advocates for it or not. All Quickseller has established is that the funds used to pay the signature campaign participants was moved. At this time, we really have no idea what the true motives are behind this. All we have is one of Quickseller's conclusions, which more often than not is always based on what I would expect from someone with a jaded/cunning point of view.

This is the reason he needs to step in here and explain without listening Lauda. I don't think listening Lauda is bringing anything good for him except not to anger her theory.
The latest prove: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148016.0

I have no obligation against Hhampuz, from my account (this is an alt if you are not aware) we have exchanged some good words in the past. I know/believe he is a gentleman.