Quote from: zitoken on May 28, 2019, 08:00:09 PM

Quote from: Miiike on May 28, 2019, 03:41:04 PM

Quote from: zitoken on May 28, 2019, 03:40:01 AM

You are most welcome to give your feedback on our project. Regarding clear information about change, our team had been talking to a wide range of people and consumers interested specially on blockchain games on geek events.

We realised that previous model it was not attending pains of the market based in this informations , the main difficult of game developers is to get support for their games and to be conneceted with games lovers.

So we decided to change it for an innovator and pioneer model, on which support this niche.

Well ok, which blockchain game event was this? I can't find your project being mentioned on any event, perhaps you can give an evidence in form of your team's nametag on said event(s)?

And I shall assume as the community had decided that this is the best suited model, this is the final and it will not be replaced with other projects anymore?

Be advised that the change happened in a mix of opinions, stratregies and pains of the market as we explained, events it was only one of our channels. We mentioned geek events, right? When we mention geek events we are refering to local communities, not big events such as GamesBeat Summit . Also be informed that we never participed as an Exhibitor or Sponsor, even because our focus it was research.

This is the final version to be launched in the market...

Ookayyy, so basically you're saying that there's no way to prove that the sudden and drastic change was due to (as you claimed) community's demand? Convenient.

And you're sure you'll stick to this model despite the possibility that your said "community" demand another change?