Quote from: Vod on May 29, 2019, 11:15:42 PM

You don't need anyone's cooperation. I can adjust/remove the feedback as needed. Just do what you feel is right. :)

Like I said, it's the same for me setting the risked amount to BTC50 or BTC0. I don't think that's important at all. And I doubt it would be an issue for Pamoldar or dbshck either.
When there's a small disagreement in trust, something that can be fixed with a couple of messages, then I think it's worth asking for cooperation. I don't need anyone's cooperation but I think that can help in this case. I did what I feel is right but I feel updating the risked amount to BTC0 would be exactly as much right.

Quote from: Vod on May 29, 2019, 11:15:42 PM

His account may be ? ? ? to you, but to default trust he has positive trust right now.

I don't see him as ???. However if I'm not mistaken he would be shown like that if yours would be his first negative trust. I think you misread my previous post.

I wish you just explicitly answered the questions I posted.

Quote from: Vod on May 30, 2019, 01:33:32 AM

Can I ask why it deserves so much trust? When I took a test drive last year, they didn't put me in their commercials for returning the car. I had no choice as they knew who I was. Sure, if OG would have been able to convert the coin to $$ without red flags, he would be a fugitive for the rest of his life. That's hard with children.

He did what he had to - let's not make it so dramatic.

I absolutely agree. He did what he had to do. A lot of us would have done the same thing, but not everyone.
However I don't think I'm getting dramatic about this. I'm just leaving positive trust on a forum. I'm not giving a medal or an award. I'm not even removing him from my distrust list as I still don't trust his judgment.
That particular action deserves positive trust. Feel free to leave negative trust to him if you think other actions of him deserve negative trust but TBH I find it absurd you think that specific action deserves negative trust just because the risked amount is not 0. Please just ask us to update the risked amount if that's the only issue you find about this.

Quote from: Vod on May 30, 2019, 01:33:32 AM

Let's also remember he was paid very generously (6 BTC a year) to brag everywhere he had all this coin...

I partially agree. I think he was very lucky getting that treasurer position. He got the money and the opportunity to prove he'd return $4 million. But that doesn't mean he doesn't deserve positive trust. Again, it's just positive trust on a forum.