Quote from: Patatas on June 02, 2019, 07:30:56 PM

Why do you have to come back and open the same accusation whenever the price of Bitcoins is high lol That thread pretty much sums up why Alex is not a scammer. Since you're already on the verge to take this issue into the hands of legal authorities, you think starting another thread on bitcointalk will make your case any better? I think not. Also, you're likely to lose that case based on the evidence that is available as of now.

You mean this evidence?

Quote from: dogedice.me on March 13, 2017, 11:14:18 AM

BitDice Casino S.L.R. seizes those funds because James broke rules 6 and 19 of BitDice Casino S.L.R. Terms Of Services. We will await AFP resolutions on how we should proceed with those funds...

The above supposes that Alex reached out to the Australian Federal Police, because I allegedly of breaking the following sections of his terms of service on his cryptocurrency casino based in Curacao (this sentence in itself is enough to make your sentence in bold laughable):

Quote

6. A User may only have one Account with the Website and shall only use the Website using such single account. It is prohibited for a User to open multiple accounts with the Company. In the event that the Website becomes aware of additional accounts opened by a User, BitDice Casino S.L.R. may close such additional accounts without notice and may confiscate funds held in such additional accounts.

Quote

19. If You breach any provision of these Agreement or BitDice Casino S.L.R has a reasonable ground to suspect that You have breached them, BitDice Casino S.L.R reserves the right not to open, suspend, close Your Account, withhold payment of your winnings and apply such funds on account of any damages due by You.

My response to #6. is that the account in which was used was not accessed for over 4 months of the funds being confiscated & alex was aware of the same ownership of the accounts when the account was created. This is provable by the registration date and last login date which alex will be forced to provide. Alex will also need to prove I accessed this account anytime near the period in which I had the 38BTC. Good luck with that my friend.
Oh, and then 19. is basically saying it is broken because I allegedly broke #6.

Now here is the cherry on the cake...Prior to my case in 2017, these entries in the terms of service saying that "we can take all of your money if you have multiple accounts" never existed prior to my scenario. And the even better part is I have the archives of the previous TOS, prior to my situation, thanks to a helpful bitcointalk member who shall remain nameless until the case is over.

If you really think Alex is still trying to take me into a legal suit for my actions as a minor after these 2 years, actions in which he had absolutely no involvement in, he's living in a fantasy land. Who is he representing? The 3 "victims" which briefly came forward, one of which has "Today I was going to do something, but I have not finished doing nothing from yesterday" in his signature? Good luck getting him in court. Or how about the russian, which he claimed was me making an alt and did not even get access to this funds anyway. Or the other, yulx, who has been the only one refunded to date as far as I am aware. Bear in mind this guy actually invested in the creation of said hyips, and he refunded him, lol!

And as I said earlier, if I have to pay the consequences for my actions as a child to get back my 38BTC, then bring it on.

Sionara bitdice & token.