Quote from: yaronidon on June 06, 2019, 05:35:03 AM

Quote from: bible_pay on June 05, 2019, 05:55:42 PM

Quote from: yaronidon on June 05, 2019, 05:39:14 PM

Sorry I am confused Roll Eyes

I thought that Sanctuaries were 40% and will remain 40%
But now I need 3 times more BBP to create a Sanctuary, so I expected 3 times less total number of Sanctuaries, and 3 Times more payout per Sanctuary.

1) Sancs always get half of the net reward - half goes to the heat miner and half to the sanc. The 40% figure was the amount a sanc would receive with 10% for governance, but now we have 48.5% for governance when including the GSC amount. But the sancs still get half of what is left.

2) You do get 3* the reward now for a sanctuary as compared to legacy sancs - this is a function of how many sancs are online (1/3rd), so the rewards are more frequent per sanc now that we only have 125 to pay.

How can web site like this one calculate our Sanctuary profit :
https://masternodecap.com/
Our web site is still showing that 40% goes to Sanctuaries.
Should we change it to (100-48.5) / 2 = 25.75% ?

Thanks for supporting Hash code, one more request:
Maybe this is better for Wallet Menu :

WALLET ->
   Windows
   -> 64bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   -> 32bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   Mac
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   Linux
   -> GUI (=QT)
   -> 64bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   -> 32bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   -> Deamon
   -> 64bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   -> 32bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   -> Arch 64bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code
   -> Arm 64bit
   -> Installation
   -> Hash code

Thanks, I e-mailed masternode cap with our changes. Yes you are correct (regarding the MN ROI portion). I would have opted to vote to keep sanc payout the same during the release of POG/GSC - but this would be at the expense of our security (pobh rewards would suffer), and I dont think thats a good idea (at least not until we have ChainLocks in Prod, for it to be floated), and I feel it would be better if the community itself approaches with the idea (of entering that proposal) rather than me.

I like the idea on the menu. I believe that was almost done - but I was too lazy to make a 4 level menu. We will keep this in mind when the next change occurs on the menu and I will evaluate possibly adding the OS type as the top level selector.