What part of the game theory and economics is your pea-sized brain incapable of understanding?

I pointed out that after the fork off, Legacy address hodlers will have tokens in both forks and the Core address hodlers will only have Core shitcoins. So Core supporters will have no Legacy coins to sell. And Legacy supporters will have Core shitcoins to dump. Why would they instead dump their real BTC if they made the conscious decision to hodl in legacy addresses.

You are delusional. "Legacy address holders" ≅ your ~~shitcoin~~[Legacy immutable protocol] supporters. Nobody gives a shit about your obscure shitcoin hard fork where miners steal everything. You and your little ragtag crew of neckbeards in your mom's basement may care about your fork, but no one else will. That's why only a handful of people are even aware of your delusional ideas. There are lots and lots of ~~Bitcoin~~[Core soft forked protocol] supporters with legacy outputs who will dump your shitcoin to hell. Just because some people are holding Segwit outputs doesn't mean legacy address holders unanimously support miners stealing half of all Bitcoin outputs. LOL. What is this bullshit about "conscious decisions?" Nobody made a conscious decision to support your obscure little shitcoin. People keep their coins where they do for a multitude of reasons.....convenience, laziness, cold storage hodling, lost coins, etc. What evidence do you have that any sizeable economic group has any interest in supporting your hard forked spinoff shitcoin?

You still have not even paid attention to the fact that Core address hodlers do not get any Legacy tokens.

Yes they do. You're the fucking retard who assumes Segwit users ≅ ~~legacy~~[Core soft forked protocol] users. Show me data that proves it. I certainly have coins in both address types and I'm sure many others do too.