You mentioned up thread that you manually review all the reports before submitting them, yet you say to ask theymos as to how many of your reports are inaccurate as evidence of the accuracy of your bot. These two items conflict with each other.
No, it's just you looking for any angle to attack me. Stop derailing every thread with that shit. Create a scam accusation about this "very dishonest person" and add it to your signature, lying asshat.
Whosoever that's doing this has done a great job for keeping the forum clean and shouldn't be accuse of be bias. Either manually reviewing the bot result or not, there's much evidence among those who had appealed for ban before now on this forum, and where shown the reason for the banned, is either by spam or by plagiarism, so, that's a good job well done by this individual in ensuring a cleaner forum for the community.
Although, am not too conversant with the attack, but will opening say it here that; @suchmoon and @Quickseller, you are members that i look upto when it to community development and coordination, but still don't understand why you two choose to attack each other for any slight instance of opinion?, please if there's any way i could say let forgiveness take it course in this whole disagreement please!!.
Once again, whosoever that's responsible on this "wave of ban" should be commended for keeping the house clean, and not to be discourage for so doing. For anybody to create scam accusation on this "is a bad idea and shouldn't be welcome".