Quote from: TECSHARE on June 10, 2019, 01:50:05 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on June 09, 2019, 10:50:01 PM

TBH I don't particularly mind him posting his assumptions and making an ass of himself except when he starts derailing unrelated threads... this subject was starting to reach into cryptohunter-level crosstrolling.

In order to have cross trolling there would need to first be trolling which is being cross trolled. Are you admitting to trolling now? Why is your trolling ok but his trolling is not acceptable? Interesting how everyone who doesn't have the protective mark of brown on their nose is just like cryptohunter all of a sudden.

"Crosstrolling" - trolling across multiple threads, like crossposting. Trolling in response to someone else's trolling would be "countertrolling" perhaps.

Quote from: Quickseller on June 10, 2019, 02:55:51 AM

As I previously stated, you previously both claimed the following:
1: you manually review each instances of plagiarism prior to reporting them:
2: theymos could attest to the accuracy of your bot in how often it shows false positives based on your report accuracy rating

You appear to have deleted some posts, however the two above statement conflict with eachother, and cannot both be true.

I didn't say "theymos could attest to the accuracy of [...] bot", I said "Feel free to ask theymos what the rate of false positives is in my reports", i.e. whatever BS you're making about the accuracy of the "bot" and whatnot is utterly irrelevant as far as the wave of bans is concerned and yes, off-topic in that thread.

Your attempt to emphasize the "bot" aspect is lovely though. Perhaps you're thinking it will somehow damage my reputation or something, if the alleged "bot" wrongs people. Except there is no bot and I take full personal responsibility for the reports I make and I profusely apologize for the wrong ones. Leave it to Quicksy to spin something like that into a negative Grin