Quote from: BharatDEX on June 10, 2019, 08:25:12 PM

Quote from: owlcatz on June 10, 2019, 08:03:54 PM

Quote from: Tomatocage on June 10, 2019, 07:31:00 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on June 10, 2019, 07:01:10 PM

There was at least one episode where you "woke up" after a lengthy period of inactivity and excluded (in your trust list) a number of users who happened to be targets of Quickseller's attacks. That will probably keep raising doubts despite the signed message.

If you're now planning to stick around for a while you should review your trust list as it has a different impact than it used to. If you're planning to go inactive again you should consider clearing the list out.

What probably happened was I logged in, saw that I had a zillion PMs, then went through them and responded accordingly. I did get quite a few PMs from various people advising me to add so-and-so to my Trust, or exclude someone from it. I didn't really feel like going back and doing months worth of research on the matter, so I probably just made the changes based on whether I liked the sender of the PM. That's why there may have been a bunch of changes on a certain date. Sorry, it's not quite as exciting as the theory of QS being in control of this acct Tongue

Anyway, that method of curating my Trust list isn't very scientific or objective, so I'll consider your last bit of advice. However, I'd have to weigh the consequences a bit more carefully before I do.

You did not really answer the question in RED above.

You specifically kicked well-trusted users off of DT1/DT2 based on QS's or OG's PM's, huh? Tongue

Why don't you ask that same question to LFC-Bitcoin ?

Do you have double standards when Lauda is doing it?

This topic is about TC. It has nothing to do with Lauda or LFC.