Quote from: Migranet on June 11, 2019, 07:52:08 PM

Quote from: invincible49 on June 10, 2019, 10:04:30 AM

Is here anyone from the team can answer to this issue? Why you are telling bounty hunters to do KYC for Migranet bounty when it is not needed legally? It's a illegal thing to do and there are so many ways to identify bounty cheaters with alt accounts. If you are forcing bounty hunters to do the KYC just for making sure of this then it is highly illegal and questionable. Beside there's no third party top KYC/AML service providers are even doing those verification rather it is being done by the bounty manager himself. What guarantee is there that people's personal information won't be leaked by the manager?

Thank you for the question and concern. To address your question we have full confidence our bounty team is handling this issue with the utmost security and your personal information is safe. We decided to go this route as identifying our token holders and verifying their identity is important to us.

Thanks for your understanding and support!

This is not what you decide to do. KYC/AML is only needed when your project is under a certain authority's law that wants you to provide all the official token buyers details. As long you are protecting your customers personal data you are respecting GDPR compliance. When you ask your crowd sale token buyers to provide their information to a Third Party KYC verification team, you are actually doing the right thing. But since you are asking bounty hunters to provide KYC only because you want to identify the cheating bounty accounts, not because it is something you are obliged to do according to your IEO rule and asking bounty hunters to submit those details, personal pictures on Google Form, not to any Third Party team who uses blockchain for securing bounty hunters data- you are actually breaking GDPR code.