Quote from: SteveStake on June 13, 2019, 01:24:46 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on June 12, 2019, 08:12:13 AM

Also, I did ask to join your campaign, which you ignored...

...I don't see any evidence of you rejecting anyone who applied.

It's not my fault you had over -8000 trust when you tried to apply. You're spending far too much time being upset over getting rejected from the campaign and I knew you were wasting my time when you tried to claim over 40% of the campaign has 1-2 merits. Sorry but I'm not interested in responding to you anymore unless you have something constructive to say or at least semi truthful.

Perhaps you should have read the remainder of my post:

Quote

2 - You appear to believe having negative trust is a reason why someone is "incapable of being trusted or making a good post" as you do not accept negative trusted people into your signature campaign. Also, I did ask to join your campaign, which you ignored, however if I was participating in your campaign, I would have left because of a) the low pay rates, and b) because I do not want to be associated with the amount of spam your campaign generates

Also, nearly 40% of who applied on your signature campaign thread who were wearing a stake.com signature as of Sunday had received either 0 or 1 merit as of last Sunday. This does not count any merit anyone received as part of being "grandfathered" into the merit system when it was implemented. If you don't believe me, here is the data I collected:

Quote