Quote from: actmyname on June 13, 2019, 01:24:56 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on June 13, 2019, 01:18:03 AM

what like he has not been caught out lying and scamming before ??

how many chances does this lying scamming piece of shit get?? let's just get this dirt bag out.

We were presenting observable instances of his lying and scamming for months? how is it still permitted to be in a position of trust? this without the extortion and shady escrow business and trust abusing whistle blowers.

This is the fourth derailment within an hour. If you want to be taken seriously, I would highly advise you to keep out of closed discussions and to avoid this kind of behavior. This is why users call you a troll: because you are redirecting discussion towards something else when the topic is focused elsewhere.

Relevant ideas need not be brought up constantly for they will come naturally.
Good ideas need not be brought up constantly since they can stand on their own.

By repeatedly stating the same things, you are giving off the appearance of a rambling theorist, regardless of the soundness of your ideas.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on June 13, 2019, 12:51:14 AM

Let us remember lauda that you are a scammer? so those you brand scammers are likely NOT scammers are they? I mean who trusts the word of a proven scammer and liar??

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on June 13, 2019, 01:00:16 AM

Well it could have something to do you with you being a proven scammer yourself? or a probable extortionist or a shady escrow? or using red trust to silence whistle blowing?? or saying fuck off you will not work within the new fair and transparent rules that ensure everyone is protected from scamming trash like you?

Pharmacist has been distancing himself from your abuse for a while.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on June 13, 2019, 01:03:53 AM

can we see the victims that we scammed we notice you and your pal hhampuz and some noob dreg have given us a shiny new flag.

be great when you are all blacklisted.

Please detail how the post is a derailment from the intial post? we honestly do not at all get your meaning.

You need to understand we believe that not all readers view all threads. A reader should be furnished with the full and optimal information in order to reach the optimal level of understanding and form the optimal opinion?

Each thread needs to stand on its own.

Why is he not black listed? lauda said HE WILL NOT work within the rules. He lied on the flag form and QS asked after this why should anyone believe what he says. We are furnishing the reader with futher vital and important information that lauda did NOT ONLY lie there but there are other more serious observable instances of his lying. This should warn the reader that if he will not only lie to abuse trust but will lie for his own direct financial gain then ......

We do not feel it is fair to the readers of this thread (only) to be deprived of such on topic and relevant information. Why take leave it to chance someone else will assist the reader if we can do it our selves.

Why not provide the reader with the best chance of reaching the optimal level of understanding? it seems both lazy and inconsiderate.

To even suggest this is related to trolling seems very strange.

I mean what is laudas story here to avoid blacklisting

1. he claimed he will not work within the rules and will do what he wants and likely get blacklisted (this is what he said) THE MOST LIKELY
2. he lied on the flag submission form RELATED TO 1
3. he didn't lie but didn't understand the submission form ? SEEMS LESS LIKELY

or now are we saying on bitcointalk permitted flow is nothing to do with the initial post you just follow the last post? seems the rules on permitted flow need some guidelines. We have had posts deleted on the basis they are not specifically related to the initial post??