Quote from: suchmoon on June 13, 2019, 07:12:06 PM

Quote from: Stryfe on June 13, 2019, 06:57:26 PM

ok and if no victims have come forward - on what evidence do you base your statement that people will lose money if they deal with QS? I will read the other posts above about QS when I get home. I again do not back either side in this. I am just curious what actual evidence there was. If there is valid evidence, I would back the flag.

Hhampuz had a business deal with QS. The link is in the OP: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129675.msg51116576#msg51116576

The deal ended with QS being fired. A few days later QS started the accusation with no proof whatsoever based on the mere fact of coins being moved by Hhampuz and makes bold claims such as "Hhampuz has stolen the excess money from the BestMixer campaign for his own personal use". Note that he didn't use the trust system (old or new) to label Hhampuz and when called out on this he said this:

Quote from: Quickseller on June 07, 2019, 11:52:52 PM

I did not say that I wanted others to tag him as a scammer. I said I believe him to be a scammer, and the reason he has not been tagged is due to tribalism.

I do think he should be tagged, but due to the trust system being broken, I don't think anyone tagging him will have any affect any anything. In lieu of tagging him, I will leave this thread open and any potential customers of his (and his current customers) can look at the evidence themselves, including the fact that many of those defending him are being paid his advertisers money by him.

Which makes me think he's seeking to damage HH's business and doesn't have an actual concern or proof of a scam, which would necessitate feedback/flag.

Here is a partial list of other frivolous accusations QS has brought up over the years about people he has grudges against:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147938.msg51387395#msg51387395

He took 20 BTC from a known scammer to sue Vod: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.msg12406963#msg12406963

There is a clear pattern.

now I have some reading to do

and this is the evidence that should have been presented in your OP - at least that is my opinion.