Quote from: Quickseller on June 15, 2019, 04:54:29 AM

Perhaps you could point out where anyone had said I was "mistaken" when minerjones backed out of multiple auctions. For reference, here is a 24 page thread in which everyone except the OP agreed it is unacceptable to back out of auctions.

You posted it as a Scam Accusation. What's the scam?

Quote from: Quickseller on June 15, 2019, 04:54:29 AM

If you believe the allegation that money was missing from what was being entrusted to lauda, minerjones and blazed, I would refer you to this, this, and this post.

This isn't the thread I linked, though there's a good chance you also started that one too... YOUR thread was clearly born out of vindictiveness and the issue at hand doesn't seem to be a problem to anybody but you.

Quote from: Chris! on September 08, 2018, 03:34:10 PM

I got my 45% refund in case anyone was questioning whether refund were done properly or not.

Quote from: Quickseller on June 15, 2019, 04:54:29 AM

It was very clearly explained that TMAN was misrepresenting the relationship between the current high bid at the time on his auction and the retail cost of what he was selling.

This post by TheNewAnon put it best:

Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on September 29, 2017, 03:55:30 AM

You must be a really miserable bittered individual OP, always trying to attack people like this.

I don't even see how this would make anyone a scammer.

1. It is an auction. People are free to bid whatever they want.
2. He is selling 2 coins, of which 1 is graded MS-69. Graded coins always have a premium attached to them, especially MS-69 or MS-70.
3. He is including a COA, adding a little value to the package.

So I think it's safe to say that your claim that TMAN is misrepresenting the cost/value of what he is selling is nonsense. Try harder.

Quote from: Quickseller on June 15, 2019, 04:54:29 AM

I was very clear as to the evidence I had regarding lauda's pill addiction from the start of the thread.

Yes. It was none. Bumpkiss. You presented no evidence, you just said you "had evidence," which in your mind was because somebody told you so. Then you continued to bump the thread over a year after you created it with nothing new to substantiate your claims.

Quote from: Quickseller on June 15, 2019, 04:54:29 AM

Helping ponzis with their code is in fact supporting the ponzi. Other types of support for ponzis is frowned upon around here. Others have received negative trust for even participating in ponzis, which is less of giving support than helping fix its code.

I'm not a big fan of ponzis either but the way you wrote up your thread title and OP makes it seem like dooglus was encouraging people to invest in it. He was not. Again, nobody cared about this issue but you.

The threads from my list you chose not to defend are horseshit, and you know it. If you just stuck to trying to do good instead of dig up meaningless dirt on others, you'd be a bit more respected around here. Your most recent battle against Hhampuz is purely vindictive and utterly unfounded, and it just helps cement your reputation for being habitually untrustworthy.