Quote from: herurist on June 18, 2019, 03:03:00 PM

Quote from: Ahrvodeex on June 17, 2019, 03:20:20 PM

Quote from: herurist on May 30, 2019, 10:46:02 PM

Quote from: vucuong16101997 on May 30, 2019, 12:39:02 PM

Quote from: kurniawan05 on May 30, 2019, 02:50:20 AM

Quote from: herurist on May 29, 2019, 10:41:34 PM

Quote from: Ahrvodeex on May 28, 2019, 07:21:22 AM

Quote from: herurist on May 25, 2019, 07:48:17 AM

Sales until August do you not have an IEO sales plan in another exchange?
I hope it becomes a future plan.

The tentative end date for the ICO is August 31st. That may be pushed back a month or so as we plan on pushing back the start of the sale. We plan on having an IEO once our coin list. As a result, it will serve as a fundraising and liquidity event. Since our ICO is registered with the SEC under Reg D 506(c), there is a period of time we have to wait until we list our coin, as there are restrictions around tokens changing hands.

It's good that ICOs already registered with the SEC will be safer, but we are entering the current trend, namely IEO, which is being hunted by many people.

I agree with this opinion, IEO is now more attractive to investors than ICO, IEO provides clarity where tokens will be listed after the token sale ends.

It is true that ieo is very hot, but it does not mean it will attract investment money easily. According to what is currently happening, the call for capital from the IEO is favorable when cooperating with exchanges: binance, houbi, ... Or is it that the project must have something special to attract money investors.

At least with the notification the IEO will make investors glance at this project rather than ICO, in my opinion, it is less attractive, but the team must also partner with several large companies so that investors glance at it.

True to some extent. Pricing for the ICO will be better than the IEO. The IEO will serve as a liquidity and fundraising event.

ICO has a lot of disbelief because with the rise of scmaers, I suggest IEO is better and this year is becoming a trend for many projects that have been successful with the sale of the IEO.

But if AhrvoDEEX still believes in ICO then it does.

IEOs are not without sin. Really its a play for exchanges to generate more revenue under he guise of vetting and due diligence. A lot of IEOs give in to scrupulous terms and the exchange often get more tokens than the public. Check Fetch.ai, Celar Network, etc, public only got 6% in IEO. Furthermore, there have been recent cases of projects not being able to withdraw IEO funds from SCs. Binance started this entire craze with their launch pad but nothing says its better one way or the other. It all comes down to doing personal due diligence and weighing the underlying merits of the project (team, existing product, scalability, ease of adoption, etc.). Our IEO has a tentative date next year but there is nothing saying we will do it for sure. It will depend on the climate at that time. Who knows, some other craze might be in 🤷🏾‍♂️