Quote from: cryptokwuk on June 21, 2019, 12:43:14 AM

Seems he has now proven the existence of the trust which holds 1.100.111 BTC and that he will be the owner of those funds within 5 months.
Which also basically proves he actually IS Satoshi.

it proves he made a declaration in court. this is no different than his copyright registration. i could declare that i am satoshi, and that i own the satoshi coins. does that make it true?

he even included caveats so that when he still can't access the funds in 5 months, there's a perfectly good explanation:

Quote

According to the filing, access to the holdings of the trust requires participation of all trustees, at least one of whom he hasnt been in contact for several years.

https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-provides-new-details-on-bitcoin-trust-at-heart-of-billion-dollar-lawsuit

the more obvious explanation is that he doesn't have access to those coins at all.