Quote from: esofelap on June 21, 2019, 01:36:06 PM

Quote from: Umka.Beliy on June 21, 2019, 12:30:47 PM

Quote from: a.kaetana on June 21, 2019, 09:00:38 AM

Quote from: Umka.Beliy on June 20, 2019, 04:05:23 PM

Quote from: a.kaetana on June 20, 2019, 10:39:08 AM

Quote from: ThunderA4DLightning on June 16, 2019, 06:40:53 PM

Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained Wink

Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?

As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.

His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?

We hope that they will rewrite the white paper and announce the team.

It doesn't matter to me whether the team will rewrite a white paper or leave it alone, the most important thing is that the team follow the roadmap and inform the community about the news and project updates.

This still needs to be done, otherwise these issues will be raised constantly.