Quote from: KTChampions on June 21, 2019, 11:43:55 AM

When hero member tema send merits only to abusers and Smart man its ok?
When I described in detail who sent merit, where, it is not specific data that are proof? I showed a lot of abusers who act on one pattern. This is specific data that is evidence of abuse.

Users have no control over where they RECEIVE merit from. The biggest scammer can send you a ton of merit and there is nothing that YOU can do to stop it. Unless there is proof that it was elicited you cannot use it as evidence against someone. There has been massive discussions about this when merit was introduced. EDUCATE YOURSELF

Quote from: KTChampions on June 21, 2019, 11:43:55 AM

You do not need to do any research. Smart man himself writes that he worked with this project and that he learned that this project was scam. But he did not warn anyone about this.
Is this not complicity in crime?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51411806#msg51411806

In the link you posted he explained himself. He withdrew from the project and even publicly stated that he thought it was a scam.

To me it indicates that he got involved with something he disagreed with, left and was transparent about it. It does not make me think that he is an intentional scammer.

Quote from: KTChampions on June 21, 2019, 11:43:55 AM

What is the name of hiring workers with multiple accounts for bumping a thread and providing this kind of service?
Evidence of these actions is in the first message.

Theymos said:

Quote from: theymos on April 22, 2019, 05:43:29 PM

Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.

What part of that is unclear to you ?

Quote from: KTChampions on June 22, 2019, 08:26:31 AM

I am stating a fact: xtraelv was unable to continue the conversation about specific facts and just ignores my last message in our discussion.
He is also trying to divert the conversation towards discussing the case with Yobit (and members of its signature campaign accused of spam) - which is irrelevant to our topic.

When you post a reply I do not have an obligation to immediately reply.

Your responses are weak, petty, obtuse, self-entitled and personal. You fail to provide sufficient proof of even some of your most basic accusations - I see absolutely no pattern of large scale corruption. I believe you are a victim of the DunningKruger effect. The fact that you have provided very weak evidence and now are resorting to personal attacks makes me view you as untrustworthy. Sorry that you didn't find the echo chamber that you were looking for.

Discussion about acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Community values. DT