xtraelv
1.) Yes. But when a huge number of abusers send merit to one user it is obvious merit abuse.
And what can you say about tema? He sent merit only to abusers (as I showed in detail). Is this behavior trustworthy?
2.)
Why you want to believe in words but not in facts?
He collaborated with the project and received money from it. He knew that this project was scam. He was silent about it.
He confessed that he had collaborated with the project and knew that it was a scam only after he received accusations of fraud - only 1 year later from the project started. Fraudsters had a lot of time to deceive people.
Smart man is a scamer. It is facts not just words.
3.) Why did you miss this item? I showed many alt accounts of Smart man and gave you examples of their fraudulent behavior.
Do you want to continue the dispute on this point or agree that here he is a scamer?
4.)
Theymos said:
When I talk about spam you say there is no evidence. When I talk about bumping, you say that spam is not prohibited (according to Teymos).
Do you seriously think that I will not see this juggling?
Alex_Sr
Why do you run away from discussing the facts? We started the discussion point by point, but you are trying to escape.
Since you are defending a scamer, then continue doing so, or acknowledge the fallacy of your behavior.
So 4 questions for you:
I prefer to talk about the facts that are discussed in the subject, so 4 questions for you:
4 all
Another remarkable evidence of Smart man's fraudulent behavior (thanks to attentive users!):
I can say so, plus or minus 65 at the price of ETH.
He discusses the price of accounts with the famous ru account seller.
1.) Yes. But when a huge number of abusers send merit to one user it is obvious merit abuse.
And what can you say about tema? He sent merit only to abusers (as I showed in detail). Is this behavior trustworthy?
2.)
Quote
In the link you posted he explained himself. He withdrew from the project and even publicly stated that he thought it was a scam.
To me it indicates that he got involved with something he disagreed with, left and was transparent about it. It does not make me think that he is an intentional scammer.
To me it indicates that he got involved with something he disagreed with, left and was transparent about it. It does not make me think that he is an intentional scammer.
Why you want to believe in words but not in facts?
He collaborated with the project and received money from it. He knew that this project was scam. He was silent about it.
He confessed that he had collaborated with the project and knew that it was a scam only after he received accusations of fraud - only 1 year later from the project started. Fraudsters had a lot of time to deceive people.
Smart man is a scamer. It is facts not just words.
3.) Why did you miss this item? I showed many alt accounts of Smart man and gave you examples of their fraudulent behavior.
Do you want to continue the dispute on this point or agree that here he is a scamer?
4.)
What is the name of hiring workers with multiple accounts for bumping a thread and providing this kind of service?
Evidence of these actions is in the first message.
Evidence of these actions is in the first message.
Theymos said:
Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.
What part of that is unclear to you ?When I talk about spam you say there is no evidence. When I talk about bumping, you say that spam is not prohibited (according to Teymos).
Do you seriously think that I will not see this juggling?
Alex_Sr
Why do you run away from discussing the facts? We started the discussion point by point, but you are trying to escape.
Since you are defending a scamer, then continue doing so, or acknowledge the fallacy of your behavior.
KTChampions I have nothing personal against you and I treat you in a neutral manner, just like other users of this forum. I don't want to offend you, but your investigation without the necessary evidence looks ridiculous.
You try to accuse many worthy users of the Russian locale of corruption. See if you think these users are worthy because they do useful things for the forum, not just trolling or writing meaningless messages.
Have you read the thread?You try to accuse many worthy users of the Russian locale of corruption. See if you think these users are worthy because they do useful things for the forum, not just trolling or writing meaningless messages.
So 4 questions for you:
Quote
1.) Smart man is involved in a huge circuit of merit abuse. Yes/No?
2.) Smart man has a lot of alts and with the help of them he deceives customers by making false reviews in his thread. Yes/No?
3.) Smart man is involved in the scam project Adab Solutions. Yes/No?
4.) Smart man was hiring in and offering Spam-service. Yes/No?
2.) Smart man has a lot of alts and with the help of them he deceives customers by making false reviews in his thread. Yes/No?
3.) Smart man is involved in the scam project Adab Solutions. Yes/No?
4.) Smart man was hiring in and offering Spam-service. Yes/No?
Doesn't it seem to you that trying to connect me with esmanthra is ridiculous? You, as a native speaker of the language, should easily distinguish my manner of communication from that of esmanthra. Changing your password in one day is just a coincidence.
When I see a person calling black white, I (naturally) become suspicious of him.It's just our well known local board troll.
~
What an interesting story! I will not even discuss this lie.~
I prefer to talk about the facts that are discussed in the subject, so 4 questions for you:
Quote
1.) Smart man is involved in a huge circuit of merit abuse. Yes/No?
2.) Smart man has a lot of alts and with the help of them he deceives customers by making false reviews in his thread. Yes/No?
3.) Smart man is involved in the scam project Adab Solutions. Yes/No?
4.) Smart man was hiring in and offering Spam-service. Yes/No?
2.) Smart man has a lot of alts and with the help of them he deceives customers by making false reviews in his thread. Yes/No?
3.) Smart man is involved in the scam project Adab Solutions. Yes/No?
4.) Smart man was hiring in and offering Spam-service. Yes/No?
4 all
Another remarkable evidence of Smart man's fraudulent behavior (thanks to attentive users!):
Approximately 60$?
I can say so, plus or minus 65 at the price of ETH.