Quote from: lind82 on June 23, 2019, 03:10:43 PM

Quote from: Umka.Beliy on June 21, 2019, 12:30:47 PM

Quote from: a.kaetana on June 21, 2019, 09:00:38 AM

Quote from: Umka.Beliy on June 20, 2019, 04:05:23 PM

Quote from: a.kaetana on June 20, 2019, 10:39:08 AM

Quote from: ThunderA4DLightning on June 16, 2019, 06:40:53 PM

Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained Wink

Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?

As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.

His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?

We hope that they will rewrite the white paper and announce the team.

LOL, even they rewrite their white paper or make another one this coin is a scam!

Remember Paycore coin that they also plagiarized their white paper? they released a new white paper after 1 week because of the accusation then abandoned the project after 2 weeks.

Paycore: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087964.0

Paycore remember, still managed to get a plus, but quite a bit, but it was all clear after they began the second draft did nothing on the road map.