Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 24, 2019, 05:20:48 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on June 24, 2019, 05:17:12 PM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 24, 2019, 05:14:01 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on June 24, 2019, 05:11:46 PM

^ how is this related to this thread?

Further evidence that hes not to be trusted. If you dont like my post report it. Ive supported the flag, he is untrustworthy.

I like your post but that flag is definitely not for signature campaign.

I think somebody must have bought his account or it got hacked or something. Lutpin was one of the most trustworthy, likeable people here at one stage.

It was like a total personality swap, he totally changed.

What I am trying to say is that timelord's flag has nothing to do with signature campaign nor that lutpin's account is maybe hacked or something (which is assumption).

Timelord confirmed this:

Quote

User:    Lutpin
You must create a topic describing the specific acts which damaged you. It must not be self-moderated.
Year and month when the damaging act occurred.
On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user violated a written contract, resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.

Lutpin said to Timelord that he will send them their share which timelord refused IIRC and created tag type 3.

Timelord wasn't in signature campaign, even if was, money was sent to participants so no one really can create flag 2/3 for signature campaign.

Also, no one can create flag type 2 or 3 if lutpin's account was sold or hacked.

I didn't make these rules, I am just pointing that flags type 2 or 3 can't be supported based on opinion and flags for 1 thing can't be supported because user did something different, in this case, you can't support flag because lutpin didn't send money for signature campaign.

No hard feelings, it is just my observation about new system.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 24, 2019, 05:28:45 PM

I think theres enough evidence there to support this specific flag. Maybe Lutpin can come into this thread & explain why he wont distribute those funds.

He literally said he will Huh

Here, in specific case:

Quote

If and when they are distributed, they should go to those who have contributed back then, not be forwarded to be allocated to and by someone else.
While I respect the time spent and work done here, this is not what the donations were made for.

Based on that, I do not plan to send the full amount to Timelord to be held in the new donation address.
I however do recognize that Timelord did actively contribute to the mexxer-2 thread and would be more than happy to forward them part of the donations for that help.
If Timelord wants to send me an address to where I can do that, and then send those funds on to the new donation address, that's their decision.

Also, if anybody had sent funds to the donation address I control and disagrees with my decision, they can contact me and upon verifying their donation, I will refund them, should they not be happy with my handling of it.

And Timelord said:

Quote from: Timelord2067 on June 18, 2019, 04:25:26 AM

As to the remaining donation funds, I actually don't want any

Sorry for editing post few times.