Quote from: Gumbi on June 26, 2019, 12:38:06 AM

Quote from: AnonymousCoder on June 25, 2019, 11:47:36 PM

Quote from: Gumbi on June 25, 2019, 11:38:14 PM

you don't know that its a scam you only believe it to be/ so far there has been no real evidence to say that it is a scam the only game this AI playing is the numbers game and all you ever talk about is what Armstrong's opinion. Only mediocre minds will take your word that it doesn't work anyone will any real intelligence will test it themselves.

For you, we are going to build a pocket calculator with "AI" written on it. That pocket calculator will, for each calculation, put out multiple results to choose from. That will keep you happy for a while.

you actually don't have any evidence based on the numbers given by the AI and the array's that prove his model is wrong so it is you who needs defend against these big claims that its a scam. None of you know how to even read an array which is a big problem, since timing is everything.

what Armstrong is saying I believe is correct he has said it multiple times throughout his career

based on the posts of Ma_talk we don't have enough information to conclude that what Armstrong is saying is false,
"There is no way that government will let any commercial business to run anything on their super-computer simply due to security reasons"

This is MA_talks conclusion which cannot be verified and simply shows he does not know for sure if they let him use it or not and really is a very weak argument and does not give any proof that Armstrong is in fact lying.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/socrates/comprehending-the-capabilities-of-ai/

Based on the energy spent ALONE, we know that his claim of $6 million spent on energy is bogus, and therefore, the entire claim is bogus. The WHOLE Sequoia burns $6 to $7 million in energy cost, and Socrates takes almost 100% capacity of Sequoia Huh

?

IMPOSSIBLE!

If you show me another instance where the US government SELLS the spare capacity of their instruments to the public, post it. Otherwise, Martin Armstrong has LIED about his software codes.