Quote from: CornedBeefHash on September 09, 2011, 05:03:19 AM

Quote from: Incomer on September 09, 2011, 04:38:50 AM

Anyone else convinced that that Rassah is a Bruce Wagner sock puppet?

No, I think Rassah appreciates proof and accuracy while exchanging information instead of emotional bullshit. Proof turns hypothesis and theory into fact.

Bruce Wagner is a not standing up for himself therefore he must be guilty of something. = Hypothesis

Bruce Wagner was found guilty in a civil action against him. = Fact

Bruce Wagner molests 3 year old cocker spaniels. = Bullshit

I just think that either he is a sock puppet or being deliberately disingenuous. I spent a bit of time reading over those things and there is proof of: Judgement against him for deliberately misleading people into believing that he could fix their financial problems with 0 positive results shown by his defense to refute this; fleeing the jurisdiction of that judgement without paying that judgement; conviction for prostitution that was plead down; confirmed judgement against him in 1 state for fleeing with sums of money owing in rent; current proceedings in another state for the same thing; current proceedings in that state for an assault as part of that.

This is not made up, the documents have been found.

That is just the stuff we know about, it is worth noting he confirmed that he is the same person in the first case - that IS the same person in the other ones - so it is him. That is a fact. The silly part is that when looking at all of that proven information, people fasten onto some animal/child sex thing that only the trolls came up with to ignore the rest. They have to be either sock puppets, deliberately disingenuous or completely dense.

Come on, how can you defend any of those things in good faith?