I mean if idiots like 1miau say " we will not believe a word you say" when you have only presented observable instances and asked questions relating to them?? then what sort of miscreant are we dealing with. How can it be trusted to allocate merit?? that's his basis for this comment? LOL
OK cryptocunthunter lets get into this thread an spray some random shit posts as always you are doing !
The Problem is that everybody "
will not believe a word you say "
Your swap between Trust and Merit complains shows us that you dont know what you realy want from us all in the End .
Maybe show us your real Skillz ( and i dont mean write a 2 pages post )
Apply for a Merit Source yourself with a Thread and show others what you are doing for the Forum and how great you are !
LOL who is this idiot lafu? oh yes, the person that expects us to believe he wasn't an insider on the cryptopia exit scam? You were pushing that exchange hard and yes your judgement and indeed word looks dubious far more than our own. Lafu we are laffing at u.
This confused off topic garbage you are spewing is only confusing for you. The NEW trust flag system is fine although the lemons flag seems to range what "some people" want to believe you "may " do in the "future" right up to "proven scamming" . The merit system is meaningless garbage.
Now to go back on topic. 1miau needs to explain his trust abuse comments because they are observably INCORRECT. They are as we just presented them above. Since right now he looks dishonest or stupid, actually both. These are not the qualities to look for with new merit sources.
Now shhhh and get back to pushing exchanges that exit scam, dirt bag.