Quote from: bitmover on June 28, 2019, 01:23:39 AM

There are no cons.

How about when I am having a lot of addresses with unspent small btc amount there, and I will just make one transaction, then expect that the number of inputs will increase, just like what @RapTarX said below.
- So, the transaction size in bytes will increase too right? Then it still okay to use a low satoshi/byte fee even the txn size is big?
This is not a con for that case?

Thanks, I just read the thread of LoyceV, it's much clearer to me now.

Quote from: joniboini on June 28, 2019, 01:41:44 AM

They can also know that if you use one single exchange address or something similar. If that's a problem for you, you might want to use coinjoin or use a good mixer before you consolidate or send your Bitcoins from those address. CMIIW.

Thanks for that, but I'm a little bit concern or curious how the fees calculated on every transaction.

Quote from: RapTarX on June 28, 2019, 01:56:18 AM

~snip
bitmover has linked a thread, when fee is lower, you can combine all the input into a single one. In that way, you can avoid the extra fee for more inputs.

Thanks for the very detailed explanation, I really appreciated it, easy to understand.

But when I did this, does the still the same if I will combine all input into single one address of the same wallet? than sending those input to another wallet address?

Quote from: hd49728 on June 28, 2019, 02:09:33 AM

Weeks ago, my transaction confirmed after three or four days. It's cool.

What is the total size in bytes of your transaction before and how many sat/byte you set for the fee?