Re: Flagging user broke an agreement and leaking confidential information
The conversation as posted by the OP https://i.imgur.com/HGZCFtT.jpg
The quoted part is before the rest of the conversation which clearly shows that there was no acceptance yet of mutually agreed terms.
https://i.imgur.com/rBGZBdB.png
Shows the seller accepts taking the risk.
https://i.imgur.com/0hD2FrX.png
Asking for proof. No acceptance has been made.
https://i.imgur.com/WJV6I2A.png
Shows the seller is not convinced there has been acceptance.
https://i.imgur.com/bMy0NvD.png
No proof of ownership - terms not met - no acceptance yet.
https://i.imgur.com/gSpI4l2.png
Quality not accepted - no acceptance yet.
https://i.imgur.com/jANNM66.png
End of conversation that was posted - where seller asks to "wait". No acceptance yet of mutually accepted terms.
The quoted part is before the rest of the conversation which clearly shows that there was no acceptance yet of mutually agreed terms.
https://i.imgur.com/rBGZBdB.png
Shows the seller accepts taking the risk.
https://i.imgur.com/0hD2FrX.png
Asking for proof. No acceptance has been made.
https://i.imgur.com/WJV6I2A.png
Shows the seller is not convinced there has been acceptance.
https://i.imgur.com/bMy0NvD.png
No proof of ownership - terms not met - no acceptance yet.
https://i.imgur.com/gSpI4l2.png
Quality not accepted - no acceptance yet.
https://i.imgur.com/jANNM66.png
End of conversation that was posted - where seller asks to "wait". No acceptance yet of mutually accepted terms.
What comes before and after the highlighted agreement is irrelevant. What you say before and after a contract does not invalidate a contract made some time between those two periods because further discussion or terms were had. A contract was technically formed, by your own clearly stated metrics, and by the information bob123 himself provided as I covered above. The instant the seller PMed bob123 a contract was formed because that act was the first act of stipulated consideration after terms were discussed and mutually agreed to.
What comes before is part of the conditions which is relevant.
He makes it clear he needs proof and escrow.
Also what came after shows the seller making a counter-offer with a variation of the terms - no escrow. If there is an offer and then a counter-offer the counter-offer automatically cancels the initial offer. A counter-offer is considered a rejection of the initial offer.
"But I need a direct deal" is a rejection of the condition of escrow.
Source: https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/offers-and-rejection-law-essay.php
The whole conversation shows they are still haggling over the terms and which accounts to buy. In order for a contract to exist there has to be agreement on the terms (escrow and proof of ownership) , which products and what price.
Shows that the seller is aware that no deal has been struck. He said "I don't know that you will buy at all". He didn't say "I'm not sure whether you will pay me for the agreed contract". This is because they had not agreed on the terms or which accounts would be bought.