Quote from: iamhungry on July 04, 2019, 12:08:45 AM

Who knows if this person was paid by a casino owner, or is one himself for that reason. There is no beating the house edge

that is assuming everything from win odds to win multipliers was correctly implemented; there was a case a few years ago where i did manage to find such a oversight on the casino's part.

Quote from: DarkDays on July 03, 2019, 09:21:09 PM

High probability of profitability, that would essentially mean that your bot is able to produce a more than 50% likelihood of being profitable over the long run.

Can you tell me how AI is able to defy randomness and the house edge to somehow make players more profitable? Don't tell me you are saying you think you can find patterns in huge random code to avoid certain numbers or favor others?

Smells like BS.

it sounds like op is implying the bot can magically conjure up conditions for +ev, which shouldnt be possible assuming the edge was correctly implemented on the house's side.

Quote from: luckybot on July 01, 2019, 03:48:28 AM

3. Do you 100% guarantee to win? NO! Just to be clear, the bot is not a 100% winning machine. Normally you play against a casino with 1% house edge and you hope to win big and walk away before you lose your money (99% chance in a casino with 1% house edge). What LuckyBot does is to fight the house edge and decrease it from 1% to 0.1% or less, which means longer shot at winning big (>99.9%). I

this is complete bs. a house edge is implemented by means of adjusting multipliers based on the win chance (multiplier less than 2x on a 50-50) or eliminating the possibility of winning in certain conditions ( 49.5 < x < 55.5, where x represents the edge case where the player cannot win assuming a 2x roll); your bot cannot change this.