Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 03:36:19 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on July 06, 2019, 02:58:33 PM

I want to know who reported it and which mod deleted it.

I reported it. It's off topic.

Delete 13 is off topic ??

HOW? refute our explanation for it being on topic chunk trunks.

The post above our own by babo was in our opinion misleading the reader and was CLEARLY demonstrating double standards in doing so. We were putting his poorly formed opinion into the correct context and demonstrating

1. he was ignoring REAL PROOF OF WRONG DOING in that same thread and conversing with the same scumbag nutildah in that same thread.
2. he was ignoring there was NO PROOF of us being and ALT of anyone and there is no link to financially motivated wrong doing ... this is not therefore comparable to the exchange he is promoting and their behavior.

He was conflating a thread with NO REAL PROOF with a thread that demonstrated 100% QS was wrong to oppose it. That is not the case. You have mislead the reader by reporting the post. There is clear evidence of financially motivated wrong doing on the one QS supported.

What is more. You as the thread starter reporting that post had MOTIVE for doing so and hiding such double standards. Since you included proven scammers and liars like lauda on DT whilst trying to berate QS for lesser evils. Your entire thread is double standards dirt.

You are clearly trying to push your one sided agenda and mislead the reader. The mod should have noted that.

There is no WAY that us refuting his evidence he is using for evidence to bolster YOUR CLAIMS are bogus and also double standards. Also demonstrating a clear lack of investigative skills in our reasonable opinion.

which mod deleted it?

The reader should have been given the opportunity to investigate our on topic and relevant opinion that directly made a rebuttal to babos spurious, ill investigated and double standards moronic claims regarding that item. This is all totally relevant to the OP.

There is no possible refutation. Bring your specious argument so that we can destroy it.