Quote from: DooMAD on July 07, 2019, 11:33:20 PM

Quote from: 100bitcoin on July 07, 2019, 10:51:35 PM

So, instead of changing Bitcoin to Asic Resistant, it is better to change your BTC holding to BTG & BCD.

What kind of atrocious advice is this? BTG has already suffered a successful hashrate and double-spend attack because their hashing power is far more centralised than BTC's. Hence my earlier comment on how changing algorithms has a direct impact on the security of the network. It creates power vacuums that are very easily filled by malicious users.

BTG? More like BTGTFO.

Quote from: subSTRATA on July 07, 2019, 11:43:42 PM

Quote from: 100bitcoin on July 07, 2019, 10:51:35 PM

There are already 2 ASIC resistant forks of Bitcoin, namely Bitcoin Gold aka BTG and Bitcoin Diamond aka BCD. So, instead of changing Bitcoin to Asic Resistant, it is better to change your BTC holding to BTG & BCD.

bitcoin gold the fork that was 51% attacked quite successfully? yeah how about not.

Both of you probably missed the subtle satire in my post. It definitely was not an advice. But, if someone proposes to change the Bitcoin protocol to be ASIC resistant, then they will be better off by converting their own BTC holding to BTG or BCD.