Those are your assumptions for which there can be NO PROOF. We formed a sensible rebuttal to the FALSE ASSUMPTIONS AND CLAIMS that were be published as a valid reason to support your THREAD TITLE and CENTRAL POINT that QS is dangerous to deal with.
Only shitposters reply to the thread title alone. Are you a shitposter? Rhetorical question. The first post of the thread sets the topic, not just the title.
It was wrong to delete the post without deleting the post by babo ... even then neither are off topic really since they have STRONG connection to your Central point.
It was absolutely correct to delete your post. If you think babo's post needs to be deleted too, you'll need to report it to a moderator.
If you want to create a comparison thread between QS and lauda
I don't. Seems to be your obsession so go ahead and do it.
Either stop pushing double standards here and supporting scum bags or we will be finding your threads and making sure the reader is privy to the FULL context and all relevant and on topic information so they are not deceived.
Sounds like a threat to derail my threads. I would advise against it.
We don't report your on topic relevant posts, you're just a pussy who knows we can debunk your specious nonsense and fear fair open debate.
We will only get along fine when you are not trying to game and weaponize broken systems for your own ends. Meet us in fair open debate or get lost. Stop snitching on minor crap you pathetic little weasel.
I offered you a
fair and open debate. You're the one who weaseled out. The offer is still open though.
LOL let me just debunk your entire argument. The thread title in this case is ALSO IS YOUR CENTRAL POINT. Which has been demonstrated to also be a double standards piece of misinformation especially when the context is YOUR OTHER OBSERVABLE BEHAVIOR here. OF course you don't want a comparison thread between someone you are trying to paint as DANGEROUS compared to someone you are supporting and trying to paint as SAFE and place in positions of TRUST. You double standards fat slob. Simply because YOU KNOW lauda is far far far more dirty looking and DANGEROUS than QS.
LOL ensuring the reader has access to ALL ontopic and relevant information sounds like a derail to suchmoon? No wonder you are so confused with your reports. Sounds like you are trying to misrepresent what we are saying as a thread. Sounds like a play out of your pal/alt laudas play book.
There is no offer there for us. You seem to have debated with cryptohunter before and been..... err very useful at demonstrating he was correct.
You are great at proving that both you and your pals are corrupt scum that seek to push out double standards. Not to mention you have also demonstrated that you will even back stab theymos and misrepresent him in a negative light to save your scumbag pals like lauda. It seems you were willing to appear an "excellent member" until lauda was directly bitch slapped.
We can't actually tell why you are so negative on QS other than the fact he seems to be the one uncovering OBSERVABLE DIRT on lauda and a lot of your OTHER pals you support and include on DT. Until you are demonstrating that you are treating each member fairly and equally expect to hear from us...where we are on-topic and relevant.
You are starting to look very dirty and DANGEROUS yourself.