Quote from: MA_talk on July 09, 2019, 03:57:39 PM

Quote from: AnonymousCoder on July 09, 2019, 02:52:08 PM

Con man meets con man

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/fake-new-silence-any-new-achievement/

Martin Armstrong fails to tell us what he did with the scooter man.

Actually I think he just made this up - never happened.

It can't get any lower than this. What's next? UFOs?

Remember, Armstrong is the guy who keeps telling us about unscientific methods in Climate Change research.

..........

....

Now, in this article, Armstrong apparently believed in the scooter man. He almost certainly made up the $50 million claim, because the so-called "perpetual machine" that takes zero energy input, but continues to produce energy, will NEVER EVER exist due to conservation of energy law. ANYONE who has taken a high-school physics class would know that the scooter man is a FRAUD, but of course, not Armstrong who has only a high-school degree based on DeSmogBlog.

That article ALONE is sufficient proof to show how much Armstrong knows about real science. Armstrong doesn't understand the most basic law of energy conversation.

The ideas on perpetual motion machines have been with us going back several hundreds of years, if not thousands of years, and ALL have been proven FAKE.

How in the world can any people trust the "energy" model from this man when he doesn't even know the most basics, and when he cannot tell the difference between 8.6 versus 8.615?

From Armstrong's
"You plugged it in once and thereafter it self-generated power and did not need to be plugged in again."

Armstrong apparently confuses with inertia of the scooter, or moving at a constant velocity, with power/energy. If there is ZERO friction, which is almost like in outer space, objects DO move forever, but the very moment, you convert its kinetic energy for your own use, the object will slow down.

Charlatan has done it again!

By the way, I want to emphasize another point. Let's say Armstrong temporarily lost his "scientific" mind when he met this scooter con man possibly 20 years ago. Isn't that AMAZING that throughout the last 20 years of recalling the same event, he is UNABLE to recognize that energy must be conserved in the entire system? Huh

If I am his physics teacher, I will give him an F.

@Gumbi, and @over45, what do you guys think about the scientific rigorousness of Armstrong's mind?