Quote from: richo262 on February 16, 2014, 03:25:53 PM

No, the difference between Atheism and Agnostic is not your concern. It is a difference in interpretation of the question, not the outcome of answer.

Atheists think they are not convinced, Agnostics think the question is unanswerable (therefore are not convinced) and Anti-theists adamantly think there is no God as narcasistically and arrogantly as you think there is a god.

So any argument pertaining to the fact that Atheists are telling you that you are 'wrong' or that there 'is no god' is not exactly what Atheism is about. Sure I get frustrated when you knuckle draggers try to ruin the education system with your lack of evidence based drivel designed to dumb the gene pool. I might say you are a total fuck tard from time to time, and I might outright say that you are just wrong. The truth is, I am just not convinced, because nothing you say it in any way shape or form at the slightest compelling.

You are in fact, the most uninteresting, and uncompelling human being that I have had the dishonor of contacting.

The difference between the three doesn't really matter here. What I'm conveying is proof through simple logic that god exists.

Nothing is nothing, therefor, everything is everything. Can we agree on that?